No RDNH Finding Leads to Questions About Treatment of Complainants Versus Respondents – vol 4.8

Ankur RahejaUncategorized Leave a Comment

No RDNH Finding Leads to Questions About Treatment of Complainants Versus Respondents: As noted by Andrew Allemann in an article in Domain Name Wire this past week, the primary allegations in the Complaint were unsubstantiated and the Complaint was essentially dead on arrival. Under the circumstances, the lack of an RDNH finding in the <gpi .com> decision is surprising. It …

ICA Member Meeting Pickleball Photos

Kamila SekiewiczBlog Leave a Comment

We are thrilled to share photos from the member meeting Pickleball Tournament, AKA the Kubba Kup! We owe a huge thank you to Jeff Brooks, who captured these action shots and made them accessible to all of us. If you’re an ICA member, you should have received a link to the photos. Reach out to us if you haven’t.

RDNH Finding in ‘No Response’ Case – vol 4.7

Ankur RahejaUDRP Case Summaries Leave a Comment

RDNH Finding in ‘No Response’ Case I found this decision particularly satisfying. It is well known that people do things online that they otherwise wouldn’t do in person. The same holds true with the UDRP. As counsel, would you dare certify an obviously incomplete or inaccurate pleading if you had to face the judge in person in a court room? …

The Legacy Idea by Mr. Sten Lillieström

Ankur RahejaBlog Leave a Comment

The Legacy Idea by Mr. Sten Lillieström (LinkedIn)  Domains are a truly remarkable commodity. They are all issued in the limited edition of 1:1 by design. So much for “stocking up on bestsellers”.    As a consequence, domain investors must rely on their ability to build theories about the nature of demand, and to uncover evidence that supports them. How? …

Respondent Fails to ‘Clearly and Accurately Disclose’ Relationship With Complainant – vol 4.6

Ankur RahejaUDRP Case Summaries Leave a Comment

Respondent Fails to ‘Clearly and Accurately Disclose’ Relationship With Complainant Although the Oki Data test has consistently been applied since 2001, it is best used as a guide and adapted as necessary by Panels. In other words, it is not enshrined in stone, but rather can be a helpful yardstick by which to measure the good or bad faith of …

ICA Member Exclusive Webinar “Web 2.5”: Bridging web2 and web3

Kamila SekiewiczBlog Leave a Comment

This Thursday, Feb 8th, ICA members are invited to a unique webinar featuring insights from the forefront of ‘Web 2.5’—the intersection where Web2 and Web3 technologies meet. This session offers a direct line to the thoughts and strategies of those at the helm of companies bridging Web2 and Web3. Now, let’s introduce our expert panel, each contributing their expertise to …

The 7th Lonnie Borck Memorial Award Ceremony

Kamila SekiewiczBlog Leave a Comment

The ICA Member Meeting in Las Vegas this year was a wonderful gathering of ICA members who learned, discussed, and connected. In addition to networking activities, sessions, and dinners, members who attended were also part of a very special event – the seventh annual Lonnie Borck Memorial Award (LBMA) Ceremony. The ceremony was held during the closing reception on Friday, …

Complainant Failing to Meet Standing Requirement of the Policy, Reprimanded – vol 4.5

Ankur RahejaUDRP Case Summaries Leave a Comment

Complainant Failing to Meet Standing Requirement of the Policy, Reprimanded: The first element of the Policy serves as a “standing requirement” under the UDRP. The threshold inquiry under the first element of the Policy typically involves a relatively straightforward comparison between the Complainant’s trademark and the disputed Domain Name, read more. [Read further commentary] We hope you will enjoy this edition …

No Love for 3-Paragraph Complaint Over Descriptive Domain, Despite Trademark – vol. 4.4

Ankur RahejaUDRP Case Summaries Leave a Comment

No Love for 3-Paragraph Complaint Over Descriptive Domain, Despite Trademark It is noteworthy and gratifying that the Panel in this matter saw fit to declare Reverse Domain Name Hijacking. This does not appear to have been a cybersquatting case, but rather an instance of a Complainant coveting a similar domain name that had been lawfully used for over ten years. …

Complainant Relies on Odd Copyright Registration But Escapes RDNH – vol. 4.3

Ankur RahejaUDRP Case Summaries Leave a Comment

We hope you will enjoy this edition of the Digest (vol. 4.3), as we review these noteworthy recent decisions, with expert commentary. (We invite guest commenters to contact us): ‣ Complainant Relies on Odd Copyright Registration But Escapes RDNH (jye .com *with commentary) ‣ Insufficient Evidence to Apply “Telstra” (hackensackmeridianhealth .xyz *with commentary) ‣ Refiled Complaint Succeeds But is this …