“Complete Absence of Evidence of Targeting” Leads to RDNH – vol. 5.35

Ankur RahejaUDRP Case Summaries Leave a Comment

“Complete Absence of Evidence of Targeting” Leads to RDNH Although not expressly mentioned in the decision, the word, “ONIRIC” happens to be a dictionary word meaning “related to dreams or dreaming”. That provides an explanation of why the Respondent registered the Domain Name in the first place and also why the Complainant selected it for its brand as well.  Of …

Three-Letter .Com Domains Are Valuable Because They’re Easy to Remember and Scarce – vol. 5.34

Ankur RahejaUDRP Case Summaries Leave a Comment

Three-Letter .Com Domains Are Valuable Because They’re Easy to Remember and Scarce An exceptionally well-reasoned decision by the Panel. I particularly appreciate how the Panel observed that “there are some three letter trademarks where the evidence of fame and reputation is well established on a world-wide basis and it is generally straightforward to at least draw an inference that registration …

Complaint Filed Despite “Voluntary” Rebranding – vol 5.32

Ankur RahejaUDRP Case Summaries Leave a Comment

Complaint Filed Despite “Voluntary” Rebranding Being overly aggressive with the UDRP can sometimes backfire, as we saw here. Having already completed the rebranding prior to the Complaint being filed, the Respondent demonstrated its willingness to voluntarily resolve this matter. Nevertheless, it was the Complainant’s allegation of bad faith registration and use combined with a lack of legitimate interest which was …

Panel Reformulates Oki Data Test and Proposes “Lost Mary Criteria” – vol. 5.30

Ankur RahejaUDRP Case Summaries Leave a Comment

Panel Reformulates Oki Data Test and Proposes “Lost Mary Criteria” It is rare for a decision to expressly adopt a new interpretative framework. Yet that is what the Panel boldly did here; the Panel found “that it is time to adjust the Oki Data criteria according to current needs in the e-commerce world” and even renamed it as the “Lost …

Panel: Complainant Made a “Farce” of the Proceeding – vol 5.29

Ankur RahejaUDRP Case Summaries Leave a Comment

Panel: Complainant Made a Farce of the Proceeding The Panel to its credit, expressly noted that the Policy enables a Respondent to establish its rights or legitimate interest in a Domain Name under Paragraph 4(c): “The Panel concludes that Respondent has a legitimate interest in respect of the Domain Name.  It is clear from the record that Respondent registered the …

Limitations of UDRP Prevent Panel from Assessing Fair Use and Laches Defense – vol. 5.28

Ankur RahejaUDRP Case Summaries Leave a Comment

The Levine Lecture series honors Gerald Levine, recipient of the ICA Lifetime Achievement Award for his significant scholarly contributions to the UDRP. Gerry is the author of “Domain Name Arbitration” and the subsequent “The Clash of Trademarks and Domain Names on the Internet.” Join us for this unique opportunity to hear from one of the most respected voices in IP …

Classic “Plan B” Case: Policy Used After Failure to Acquire Domain Name in Marketplace – vol 5.27

Ankur RahejaUDRP Case Summaries Leave a Comment

The Levine Lecture series honors Gerald Levine, recipient of the ICA Lifetime Achievement Award for his significant scholarly contributions to the UDRP. Gerry is the author of “Domain Name Arbitration” and the subsequent “The Clash of Trademarks and Domain Names on the Internet.” Join us for this unique opportunity to hear from one of the most respected voices in IP …

Selling Price Does Not Reflect Targeting of the Complainant’s Trademark – vol 5.26

Ankur RahejaUDRP Case Summaries Leave a Comment

The Levine Lecture series honors Gerald Levine, recipient of the ICA Lifetime Achievement Award for his significant scholarly contributions to the UDRP. Gerry is the author of “Domain Name Arbitration” and the subsequent “The Clash of Trademarks and Domain Names on the Internet.” Join us for this unique opportunity to hear from one of the most respected voices in IP …